Comment from James Campbell

Document ID: CPSC-2011-0074-0004
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Consumer Product Safety Commission
Received Date: October 11 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: October 12 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: October 11 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: December 12 2011, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80f50633
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

As a woodworker, I have spent much time learning and using myriad powertools. All tools require respect and cautious use. They are inherently dangerous when used improperly. Such as using a saw with the blade guard removed. I strongly disagree with requirement of SawStop blade break technology. For the simple reason, the technology gives the user a false belief in the safety of the saw. A lack of respect and education cannot be overcome by a safety device. I've already met young woodworkers who learned on the SawStop. Their approach to tools shows a disturbing lack of caution as they have come to believe the table saw is safe. Anyone who lacks that fear and respect is in danger. I also find it disturbing that the holder of the SawStop patents has been the lead in lobbying for these new rules. Table saw injuries have existed long before his invention. Thank you for your consideration.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 959
Comment from Jerome Olson
Public Submission    Posted: 10/12/2011     ID: CPSC-2011-0074-0002

Dec 12,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Alan Stantion
Public Submission    Posted: 10/12/2011     ID: CPSC-2011-0074-0003

Dec 12,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from James Campbell
Public Submission    Posted: 10/12/2011     ID: CPSC-2011-0074-0004

Dec 12,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Brian Ogilvie
Public Submission    Posted: 10/12/2011     ID: CPSC-2011-0074-0005

Dec 12,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from David Stone
Public Submission    Posted: 10/12/2011     ID: CPSC-2011-0074-0006

Dec 12,2011 11:59 PM ET